GEAR REVIEW // The X100T: a review in five pieces by Patrick La Roque

ok it is know secret we here at WECC love FUJIFILM and in particular the X100 in all it's variations. So when yet another review pops up on the WWW we are here to enjoy and spread the word ...... WORD

I longed for Istanbul. Or Madrid, Cairo, Rio. I longed for the circus, for freight trains, for a rush of uncertainty in long and aimless circumambulations; for an assault on the senses and a total loss of balance, making my way through the unknown, sinking in strange quicksand crowds with my eye to a small window.

That was me, waxing poetic during the intro of the X100S review almost two years ago. It may have seemed strange to some that a camera, a simple capture device, could elicit such a high level of emotion; but I believe objects can become more than the sum of their parts. These tools can become an extension of ourselves and when they do, something else happens: they inspire us. To this day when I see an X100 I have an almost Pavlovian response, something I can only describe as photographic withdrawal syndrome: it makes me need to shoot. Anything. It also infects me with a serious case of wanderlust, which I imagine is a byproduct of these cameras being my constant travel companions since the very first version hit the scene; I still own that original model with all its beautiful infuriating faults.


Source (

Leica M9-P vs Fuji X100s vs Nikon D40

35mm Lens Shoot-Out Yeeeehhaaaaaa

Nikon D40 Kit-lens 18-55 f/5.6 / Fuji X100s f/5.6 / Leica M9-P/35mm f/5.6 Summocron / ALL ISO 400

"Why?!" You ask.

"Why not!" We say.

So I had about 5 minutes to kill before a job and had all 3 cameras in my bag; the Leica M9-P, Fujifilm X100s and the always charming Nikon D40. How could I not do a crazy comparison just for the hell of it. They all had 35mm equivalent lenses and I had some time to spare so away we go!

  • I quickly set all cameras to the following settings: raw format, ISO 400, f/5.6. I grabbed the nearest tree & a friend and fired one shot each. Unfortunately the framing and distance was a little off for each which is my mistake but this isn't meant to be a scientific test.
  • Next I imported the files into Lightroom 5.4 and saved the untouched files as they were rendered by default.
  • I then took them strait into Photoshop CC, and applied a custom Silver Efex Pro 2 preset.
  • Back in Lightroom, I adjusted the exposure, highlights and shadows slightly to get a basic match (VERY BNASIC) then saved the files.
  • In Photoscape I ran Auto Exposure, Auto Contrast and sharpening at 0.8 (for the portrait no sharpening) then saved and combined with originals to create the image above and below.

A very tech savvy comparison to say the least. I just wished to see what the simple differences with a quickly adjusted and filtered image would look like for each. I hadn't bothered doing crops or anything as the process was hardly ideal for the likes of DXO .... but then I changed my mind and did a crop section of each any way. 

A Detailed Crop

Above are the three raw and untouched images cropped as close as I could in Photoscape. 1. Nikon D40 2. Fuji X100s 3. Leica M9-P

The 3 final images above have been processed in Silver Efex Pro 2 using the Kodak Tri-X preset with no other adjustments, taken into Photoscape for Auto Exposure, Auto Contrast & 0.8 sharpening applied then saved at 72dpi as a JPEG. If you click on the images you can see them in full screen to get a better look at the detail. The same applies for the crops below.

Morgan also took 3 shots of James with each of the set ups we mentioned earlier. only change to the setup was using a 'Kodack TMax 400' preset in 'Silver Efex Pro 2' with no sharpening in 'Photoscape'.

Nikon D40 Kit Lens | Raw File - Processed File

Fukifilm X100s |  RAW File - Processed File

Leica M9-P  35mm Summicron | RAW File - Processed File

So there you go, a really quick look at three totally different cameras and their 35mm equivalent focal lengths / lenses. Totally unrelated really but I had them all with me and thought hell, why not. One thing I thought about while doing this test was how well the old Nikon D40 held up. Considering it has only 7 megapixels and relatively old sensor technology and, we used the kit lens. What a gem, so much so that I am actually going to do a portrait test with the Nikon DF and the Nikon D40 using the same lens a Nikkor 105mm f/1.8 so stay tuned.

Cheers again and just remember to take this review test thing with a grain of salt. It was done for fun and in no way is an accurate technical test of the cameras and their lenses against each other. However, it may get you thinking about the gear you use and the practical quality and abilities of so called "out of date" equipment. If all you'r doing is posting things to Facebook or Flickr, then as they say, "The best camera is the one you have with you."